Review



rps15a  (Boster Bio)


Bioz Verified Symbol Boster Bio is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Boster Bio manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Boster Bio rps15a
    The expression pattern of ribosomal proteins during EHT at the proteome level. (A) The distribution and quantity of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins were analyzed using bulk‐cell proteomic data during EHT (EC: endothelial cell, n = 3; HEC: hemogenic endothelial cell, n = 3; HC: hematopoietic cell, n = 3). (B) The average expression level of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins during EHT. (C) The stage‐specific ribosome‐related proteins during EHT. The relative fold change of average protein expression level was represented between adjacent populations. (D, E) The differentially expressed pattern of <t>RPS15a,</t> RPL27 and RACK1 at transcriptome (D) and proteome (E) levels.
    Rps15a, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rps15a/Anti-RPS15A+Antibody+Picoband/pmc12485867-28-21-22
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rps15a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Characterization of ribosome heterogeneity during endothelial to hematopoietic transition"

    Article Title: Characterization of ribosome heterogeneity during endothelial to hematopoietic transition

    Journal: FEBS Open Bio

    doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.70078

    The expression pattern of ribosomal proteins during EHT at the proteome level. (A) The distribution and quantity of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins were analyzed using bulk‐cell proteomic data during EHT (EC: endothelial cell, n = 3; HEC: hemogenic endothelial cell, n = 3; HC: hematopoietic cell, n = 3). (B) The average expression level of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins during EHT. (C) The stage‐specific ribosome‐related proteins during EHT. The relative fold change of average protein expression level was represented between adjacent populations. (D, E) The differentially expressed pattern of RPS15a, RPL27 and RACK1 at transcriptome (D) and proteome (E) levels.
    Figure Legend Snippet: The expression pattern of ribosomal proteins during EHT at the proteome level. (A) The distribution and quantity of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins were analyzed using bulk‐cell proteomic data during EHT (EC: endothelial cell, n = 3; HEC: hemogenic endothelial cell, n = 3; HC: hematopoietic cell, n = 3). (B) The average expression level of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins during EHT. (C) The stage‐specific ribosome‐related proteins during EHT. The relative fold change of average protein expression level was represented between adjacent populations. (D, E) The differentially expressed pattern of RPS15a, RPL27 and RACK1 at transcriptome (D) and proteome (E) levels.

    Techniques Used: Expressing

    Quantitative analysis of ribosomal protein expression by immunofluorescence. (A) Representative immunofluorescence images showing subcellular localization of RACK1, RPL27, RPS15a and RPS6 in AECs (CD41 − CD43 − CD45 − CD31 + CD201 − Kit − CD44 + ), HECs (CD41 − CD43 − CD45 − CD31 + CD201 + Kit + CD44 + ) and HCs (CD45 + Kit + ). Scale bars = 10 μm. (B) Quantitative analysis of ribosomal protein expression through immunofluorescence signal intensity measurement. Data were collected from single AEC ( n = 6), HEC ( n = 6) and HC ( n = 5). Data are presented as the mean ± SD and analyzed by unpaired two‐tailed Student's t ‐test. Data were collected from three independent experiments.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Quantitative analysis of ribosomal protein expression by immunofluorescence. (A) Representative immunofluorescence images showing subcellular localization of RACK1, RPL27, RPS15a and RPS6 in AECs (CD41 − CD43 − CD45 − CD31 + CD201 − Kit − CD44 + ), HECs (CD41 − CD43 − CD45 − CD31 + CD201 + Kit + CD44 + ) and HCs (CD45 + Kit + ). Scale bars = 10 μm. (B) Quantitative analysis of ribosomal protein expression through immunofluorescence signal intensity measurement. Data were collected from single AEC ( n = 6), HEC ( n = 6) and HC ( n = 5). Data are presented as the mean ± SD and analyzed by unpaired two‐tailed Student's t ‐test. Data were collected from three independent experiments.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Immunofluorescence, Two Tailed Test

    Related Articles

    Expressing:

    Article Title: Characterization of ribosome heterogeneity during endothelial to hematopoietic transition
    Article Snippet: Fluorescence images were acquired using a laser scanning confocal microscope (LSM 980; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with consistent acquisition parameters across samples.Fluorescence images were acquired using a laser scanning confocal microscope (LSM 980; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with consistent acquisition parameters across samples.. The primary antibodies were as follows: RACK1 (Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA; dilution 1 : 200), RPL27 (Proteintech; dilution 1 : 50), RPS15a (Boster, Pleasanton, CA, USA; dilution 1 : 50) and RPS6 (Proteintech; dilution 1 : 50).

    Immunofluorescence:

    Article Title: Characterization of ribosome heterogeneity during endothelial to hematopoietic transition
    Article Snippet: Fluorescence images were acquired using a laser scanning confocal microscope (LSM 980; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with consistent acquisition parameters across samples.Fluorescence images were acquired using a laser scanning confocal microscope (LSM 980; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with consistent acquisition parameters across samples.. The primary antibodies were as follows: RACK1 (Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA; dilution 1 : 200), RPL27 (Proteintech; dilution 1 : 50), RPS15a (Boster, Pleasanton, CA, USA; dilution 1 : 50) and RPS6 (Proteintech; dilution 1 : 50).

    Two Tailed Test:

    Article Title: Characterization of ribosome heterogeneity during endothelial to hematopoietic transition
    Article Snippet: Fluorescence images were acquired using a laser scanning confocal microscope (LSM 980; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with consistent acquisition parameters across samples.Fluorescence images were acquired using a laser scanning confocal microscope (LSM 980; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with consistent acquisition parameters across samples.. The primary antibodies were as follows: RACK1 (Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA; dilution 1 : 200), RPL27 (Proteintech; dilution 1 : 50), RPS15a (Boster, Pleasanton, CA, USA; dilution 1 : 50) and RPS6 (Proteintech; dilution 1 : 50).



    Similar Products

    86
    Genechem rps15a overexpression
    Rps15a Overexpression, supplied by Genechem, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rps15a/overexpression+rps15a/pm41653713-82-9-14
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rps15a overexpression - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Boster Bio rps15a
    The expression pattern of ribosomal proteins during EHT at the proteome level. (A) The distribution and quantity of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins were analyzed using bulk‐cell proteomic data during EHT (EC: endothelial cell, n = 3; HEC: hemogenic endothelial cell, n = 3; HC: hematopoietic cell, n = 3). (B) The average expression level of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins during EHT. (C) The stage‐specific ribosome‐related proteins during EHT. The relative fold change of average protein expression level was represented between adjacent populations. (D, E) The differentially expressed pattern of <t>RPS15a,</t> RPL27 and RACK1 at transcriptome (D) and proteome (E) levels.
    Rps15a, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rps15a/Anti-RPS15A+Antibody+Picoband/pmc12485867-28-21-22
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rps15a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    ABclonal Biotechnology rabbit anti rps15a
    The expression pattern of ribosomal proteins during EHT at the proteome level. (A) The distribution and quantity of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins were analyzed using bulk‐cell proteomic data during EHT (EC: endothelial cell, n = 3; HEC: hemogenic endothelial cell, n = 3; HC: hematopoietic cell, n = 3). (B) The average expression level of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins during EHT. (C) The stage‐specific ribosome‐related proteins during EHT. The relative fold change of average protein expression level was represented between adjacent populations. (D, E) The differentially expressed pattern of <t>RPS15a,</t> RPL27 and RACK1 at transcriptome (D) and proteome (E) levels.
    Rabbit Anti Rps15a, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rps15a/RPS15A+Rabbit+pAb/bio_rxiv__2025__05__27__656475-304-55-57
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti rps15a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Genechem lentiviruses encoding rps15a shrna
    The expression pattern of ribosomal proteins during EHT at the proteome level. (A) The distribution and quantity of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins were analyzed using bulk‐cell proteomic data during EHT (EC: endothelial cell, n = 3; HEC: hemogenic endothelial cell, n = 3; HC: hematopoietic cell, n = 3). (B) The average expression level of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins during EHT. (C) The stage‐specific ribosome‐related proteins during EHT. The relative fold change of average protein expression level was represented between adjacent populations. (D, E) The differentially expressed pattern of <t>RPS15a,</t> RPL27 and RACK1 at transcriptome (D) and proteome (E) levels.
    Lentiviruses Encoding Rps15a Shrna, supplied by Genechem, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rps15a/lentiviruses+encoding+rps15a+shrna/pm40239541-43-11-22
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    lentiviruses encoding rps15a shrna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    OriGene primary antibodies against rps15a ta369533s
    The expression pattern of ribosomal proteins during EHT at the proteome level. (A) The distribution and quantity of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins were analyzed using bulk‐cell proteomic data during EHT (EC: endothelial cell, n = 3; HEC: hemogenic endothelial cell, n = 3; HC: hematopoietic cell, n = 3). (B) The average expression level of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins during EHT. (C) The stage‐specific ribosome‐related proteins during EHT. The relative fold change of average protein expression level was represented between adjacent populations. (D, E) The differentially expressed pattern of <t>RPS15a,</t> RPL27 and RACK1 at transcriptome (D) and proteome (E) levels.
    Primary Antibodies Against Rps15a Ta369533s, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rps15a/rps15a+antibody/pmc11859666-107-3-19
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary antibodies against rps15a ta369533s - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    OriGene rps15a antibody
    The expression pattern of ribosomal proteins during EHT at the proteome level. (A) The distribution and quantity of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins were analyzed using bulk‐cell proteomic data during EHT (EC: endothelial cell, n = 3; HEC: hemogenic endothelial cell, n = 3; HC: hematopoietic cell, n = 3). (B) The average expression level of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins during EHT. (C) The stage‐specific ribosome‐related proteins during EHT. The relative fold change of average protein expression level was represented between adjacent populations. (D, E) The differentially expressed pattern of <t>RPS15a,</t> RPL27 and RACK1 at transcriptome (D) and proteome (E) levels.
    Rps15a Antibody, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rps15a/rps15a+antibody/pm40000433-81-53-55
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rps15a antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    OriGene rps15a
    RPS15AP12‐lncRNA competitively combines miR‐96‐3p to positively regulate <t>RPS15A</t> expression. (A) Spearman's correlation analysis between RNA levels of RPS15AP12 and RPS15A according to the TCGA ovarian cancer cohort. (B) RT‐qPCR assays detecting the expression of RPS15A upon RPS15AP12 KO in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (C) Western blot detecting the protein level of RPS15A upon RPS15AP12 KO in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (D) Representative IHC staining images and quantitative analysis of RPS15A in xenograft tumours from RPS15AP12 knockout and control cells treated nude mice. Scale bar, 100 µm. Statistical analyses showed the IHC staining of RPS15A from xenograft tumours. (E) AGO2 RIP‐PCR detecting the binding of RPS15A and RPS15AP12 with miRNAs. (F) Venn plot showing co‐binding miRNAs shared by RPA15A and RPS15AP12. (G) Schematic diagram of the binding site and sequence in miR‐96, RPS15AP12 and RPS15A. RT‐qPCR detecting miR‐96‐3p level upon miR‐96‐3p mimics and miR‐96‐3p inhibitor in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (H) RT‐qPCR detecting miR‐96‐3p expression upon miR‐96‐3p mimics and miR‐96‐3p inhibitor in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (I) RT‐qPCR detecting RPS15A mRNA level upon miR‐96‐3p mimics and miR‐96‐3p inhibitor in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (J) RT‐qPCR detecting RPS15A mRNA level was performed with control, RPS15AP12‐KO, and RPS15AP12‐KO+miR‐96‐3p inhibitor in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. RT‐qPCR detecting RPS15A mRNA level was performed with control, RPS15AP12‐OE, and RPS15AP12‐OE+miR‐96‐3p mimics in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (K) The schematic diagram of wild‐type and mutant 3′UTR of RPS15A for luciferase assays. (L, M) Luciferase assays of RPS15A‐WT and RPS15A‐MUT upon control, miR‐96‐3p mimics and miR‐96‐3p mimics+RPS15AP12‐OE in HEK293T and OVCAR3 cells. One‐way ANOVA, * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001; NS, not significant.
    Rps15a, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rps15a/RPS15A+Rabbit+Polyclonal+Antibody/pmc11859666-101-17-20
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rps15a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Bethyl anti rps15aa
    RPS15AP12‐lncRNA competitively combines miR‐96‐3p to positively regulate <t>RPS15A</t> expression. (A) Spearman's correlation analysis between RNA levels of RPS15AP12 and RPS15A according to the TCGA ovarian cancer cohort. (B) RT‐qPCR assays detecting the expression of RPS15A upon RPS15AP12 KO in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (C) Western blot detecting the protein level of RPS15A upon RPS15AP12 KO in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (D) Representative IHC staining images and quantitative analysis of RPS15A in xenograft tumours from RPS15AP12 knockout and control cells treated nude mice. Scale bar, 100 µm. Statistical analyses showed the IHC staining of RPS15A from xenograft tumours. (E) AGO2 RIP‐PCR detecting the binding of RPS15A and RPS15AP12 with miRNAs. (F) Venn plot showing co‐binding miRNAs shared by RPA15A and RPS15AP12. (G) Schematic diagram of the binding site and sequence in miR‐96, RPS15AP12 and RPS15A. RT‐qPCR detecting miR‐96‐3p level upon miR‐96‐3p mimics and miR‐96‐3p inhibitor in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (H) RT‐qPCR detecting miR‐96‐3p expression upon miR‐96‐3p mimics and miR‐96‐3p inhibitor in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (I) RT‐qPCR detecting RPS15A mRNA level upon miR‐96‐3p mimics and miR‐96‐3p inhibitor in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (J) RT‐qPCR detecting RPS15A mRNA level was performed with control, RPS15AP12‐KO, and RPS15AP12‐KO+miR‐96‐3p inhibitor in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. RT‐qPCR detecting RPS15A mRNA level was performed with control, RPS15AP12‐OE, and RPS15AP12‐OE+miR‐96‐3p mimics in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (K) The schematic diagram of wild‐type and mutant 3′UTR of RPS15A for luciferase assays. (L, M) Luciferase assays of RPS15A‐WT and RPS15A‐MUT upon control, miR‐96‐3p mimics and miR‐96‐3p mimics+RPS15AP12‐OE in HEK293T and OVCAR3 cells. One‐way ANOVA, * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001; NS, not significant.
    Anti Rps15aa, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rps15a/RPS15A+Antibody/pmc11625335-253-63-69
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti rps15aa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    The expression pattern of ribosomal proteins during EHT at the proteome level. (A) The distribution and quantity of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins were analyzed using bulk‐cell proteomic data during EHT (EC: endothelial cell, n = 3; HEC: hemogenic endothelial cell, n = 3; HC: hematopoietic cell, n = 3). (B) The average expression level of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins during EHT. (C) The stage‐specific ribosome‐related proteins during EHT. The relative fold change of average protein expression level was represented between adjacent populations. (D, E) The differentially expressed pattern of RPS15a, RPL27 and RACK1 at transcriptome (D) and proteome (E) levels.

    Journal: FEBS Open Bio

    Article Title: Characterization of ribosome heterogeneity during endothelial to hematopoietic transition

    doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.70078

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The expression pattern of ribosomal proteins during EHT at the proteome level. (A) The distribution and quantity of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins were analyzed using bulk‐cell proteomic data during EHT (EC: endothelial cell, n = 3; HEC: hemogenic endothelial cell, n = 3; HC: hematopoietic cell, n = 3). (B) The average expression level of RPL, RPS and RAP proteins during EHT. (C) The stage‐specific ribosome‐related proteins during EHT. The relative fold change of average protein expression level was represented between adjacent populations. (D, E) The differentially expressed pattern of RPS15a, RPL27 and RACK1 at transcriptome (D) and proteome (E) levels.

    Article Snippet: The primary antibodies were as follows: RACK1 (Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA; dilution 1 : 200), RPL27 (Proteintech; dilution 1 : 50), RPS15a (Boster, Pleasanton, CA, USA; dilution 1 : 50) and RPS6 (Proteintech; dilution 1 : 50).

    Techniques: Expressing

    Quantitative analysis of ribosomal protein expression by immunofluorescence. (A) Representative immunofluorescence images showing subcellular localization of RACK1, RPL27, RPS15a and RPS6 in AECs (CD41 − CD43 − CD45 − CD31 + CD201 − Kit − CD44 + ), HECs (CD41 − CD43 − CD45 − CD31 + CD201 + Kit + CD44 + ) and HCs (CD45 + Kit + ). Scale bars = 10 μm. (B) Quantitative analysis of ribosomal protein expression through immunofluorescence signal intensity measurement. Data were collected from single AEC ( n = 6), HEC ( n = 6) and HC ( n = 5). Data are presented as the mean ± SD and analyzed by unpaired two‐tailed Student's t ‐test. Data were collected from three independent experiments.

    Journal: FEBS Open Bio

    Article Title: Characterization of ribosome heterogeneity during endothelial to hematopoietic transition

    doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.70078

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Quantitative analysis of ribosomal protein expression by immunofluorescence. (A) Representative immunofluorescence images showing subcellular localization of RACK1, RPL27, RPS15a and RPS6 in AECs (CD41 − CD43 − CD45 − CD31 + CD201 − Kit − CD44 + ), HECs (CD41 − CD43 − CD45 − CD31 + CD201 + Kit + CD44 + ) and HCs (CD45 + Kit + ). Scale bars = 10 μm. (B) Quantitative analysis of ribosomal protein expression through immunofluorescence signal intensity measurement. Data were collected from single AEC ( n = 6), HEC ( n = 6) and HC ( n = 5). Data are presented as the mean ± SD and analyzed by unpaired two‐tailed Student's t ‐test. Data were collected from three independent experiments.

    Article Snippet: The primary antibodies were as follows: RACK1 (Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA; dilution 1 : 200), RPL27 (Proteintech; dilution 1 : 50), RPS15a (Boster, Pleasanton, CA, USA; dilution 1 : 50) and RPS6 (Proteintech; dilution 1 : 50).

    Techniques: Expressing, Immunofluorescence, Two Tailed Test

    RPS15AP12‐lncRNA competitively combines miR‐96‐3p to positively regulate RPS15A expression. (A) Spearman's correlation analysis between RNA levels of RPS15AP12 and RPS15A according to the TCGA ovarian cancer cohort. (B) RT‐qPCR assays detecting the expression of RPS15A upon RPS15AP12 KO in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (C) Western blot detecting the protein level of RPS15A upon RPS15AP12 KO in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (D) Representative IHC staining images and quantitative analysis of RPS15A in xenograft tumours from RPS15AP12 knockout and control cells treated nude mice. Scale bar, 100 µm. Statistical analyses showed the IHC staining of RPS15A from xenograft tumours. (E) AGO2 RIP‐PCR detecting the binding of RPS15A and RPS15AP12 with miRNAs. (F) Venn plot showing co‐binding miRNAs shared by RPA15A and RPS15AP12. (G) Schematic diagram of the binding site and sequence in miR‐96, RPS15AP12 and RPS15A. RT‐qPCR detecting miR‐96‐3p level upon miR‐96‐3p mimics and miR‐96‐3p inhibitor in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (H) RT‐qPCR detecting miR‐96‐3p expression upon miR‐96‐3p mimics and miR‐96‐3p inhibitor in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (I) RT‐qPCR detecting RPS15A mRNA level upon miR‐96‐3p mimics and miR‐96‐3p inhibitor in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (J) RT‐qPCR detecting RPS15A mRNA level was performed with control, RPS15AP12‐KO, and RPS15AP12‐KO+miR‐96‐3p inhibitor in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. RT‐qPCR detecting RPS15A mRNA level was performed with control, RPS15AP12‐OE, and RPS15AP12‐OE+miR‐96‐3p mimics in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (K) The schematic diagram of wild‐type and mutant 3′UTR of RPS15A for luciferase assays. (L, M) Luciferase assays of RPS15A‐WT and RPS15A‐MUT upon control, miR‐96‐3p mimics and miR‐96‐3p mimics+RPS15AP12‐OE in HEK293T and OVCAR3 cells. One‐way ANOVA, * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001; NS, not significant.

    Journal: Clinical and Translational Medicine

    Article Title: Genome‐wide profiling of N6‐methyladenosine‐modified pseudogene‐derived long noncoding RNAs reveals the tumour‐promoting and innate immune‐restraining function of RPS15AP12 in ovarian cancer

    doi: 10.1002/ctm2.70249

    Figure Lengend Snippet: RPS15AP12‐lncRNA competitively combines miR‐96‐3p to positively regulate RPS15A expression. (A) Spearman's correlation analysis between RNA levels of RPS15AP12 and RPS15A according to the TCGA ovarian cancer cohort. (B) RT‐qPCR assays detecting the expression of RPS15A upon RPS15AP12 KO in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (C) Western blot detecting the protein level of RPS15A upon RPS15AP12 KO in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (D) Representative IHC staining images and quantitative analysis of RPS15A in xenograft tumours from RPS15AP12 knockout and control cells treated nude mice. Scale bar, 100 µm. Statistical analyses showed the IHC staining of RPS15A from xenograft tumours. (E) AGO2 RIP‐PCR detecting the binding of RPS15A and RPS15AP12 with miRNAs. (F) Venn plot showing co‐binding miRNAs shared by RPA15A and RPS15AP12. (G) Schematic diagram of the binding site and sequence in miR‐96, RPS15AP12 and RPS15A. RT‐qPCR detecting miR‐96‐3p level upon miR‐96‐3p mimics and miR‐96‐3p inhibitor in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (H) RT‐qPCR detecting miR‐96‐3p expression upon miR‐96‐3p mimics and miR‐96‐3p inhibitor in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (I) RT‐qPCR detecting RPS15A mRNA level upon miR‐96‐3p mimics and miR‐96‐3p inhibitor in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (J) RT‐qPCR detecting RPS15A mRNA level was performed with control, RPS15AP12‐KO, and RPS15AP12‐KO+miR‐96‐3p inhibitor in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. RT‐qPCR detecting RPS15A mRNA level was performed with control, RPS15AP12‐OE, and RPS15AP12‐OE+miR‐96‐3p mimics in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines. (K) The schematic diagram of wild‐type and mutant 3′UTR of RPS15A for luciferase assays. (L, M) Luciferase assays of RPS15A‐WT and RPS15A‐MUT upon control, miR‐96‐3p mimics and miR‐96‐3p mimics+RPS15AP12‐OE in HEK293T and OVCAR3 cells. One‐way ANOVA, * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001; NS, not significant.

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies were as follows: METTL3 (1:1000, 15073‐1‐AP, Proteintech), FTO (1:1000, 27226‐1‐AP, Proteintech), YTHDF2 (1:2000, 24744‐1‐AP, Proteintech), RPS15A (1:1000, TA369533S, ORIGENE), MDA5 (1:2000, 21775‐1‐AP, Proteintech), RIG‐1 (1:1000, 20566‐1‐AP, Proteintech), TBK1 (1:1000, #3504, CST), p‐TBK1 (1:1000, 82383‐1‐RR, Proteintech), IRF3 (1:5000, 11312‐1‐AP, Proteintech), p‐IRF3 (1:1000, 29528‐1‐AP, Proteintech), GAPDH (1:10000, 60004‐1‐Ig, Proteintech).

    Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Immunohistochemistry, Knock-Out, Control, Binding Assay, Sequencing, Mutagenesis, Luciferase

    RPS15AP12 inhibits the anti‐tumour effect of innate immune‐related pathways in ovarian cancer. (A) Volcano plot showing log2(fold change) and p ‐value of RNA‐seq upon RPS15A knockdown and RPS15AP12 knockout. (B) Overlapped DEGs of RNA‐seq upon RPS15A knockdown and RPS15AP12 knockout. (C) Enrichment network showing innate immune‐related pathways and corresponding hub genes by RPS15A knockdown and RPS15AP12 knockout. (D) Heatmap of 25 shared DEGs in innate immune‐related and proliferation‐related pathways in RNA‐seq upon RPS15A knockdown and RPS15AP12 knockout. (E) RT‐qPCR detecting RNA level of 25 shared DEGs in innate immune‐related and apoptosis‐related pathways in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines upon RPS15AP12 KO. (F) RT‐qPCR detecting RNA level of 25 shared DEGs in innate immune‐related pathways in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines upon RPS15A knockdown. (G) Western blot assays detecting protein expression using antibodies as indicated in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines upon RPS15A knockdown. (H) Western blot assays detecting protein expression using antibodies as indicated in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines upon RPS15AP12 depletion. One‐way ANOVA, * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001; NS, not significant.

    Journal: Clinical and Translational Medicine

    Article Title: Genome‐wide profiling of N6‐methyladenosine‐modified pseudogene‐derived long noncoding RNAs reveals the tumour‐promoting and innate immune‐restraining function of RPS15AP12 in ovarian cancer

    doi: 10.1002/ctm2.70249

    Figure Lengend Snippet: RPS15AP12 inhibits the anti‐tumour effect of innate immune‐related pathways in ovarian cancer. (A) Volcano plot showing log2(fold change) and p ‐value of RNA‐seq upon RPS15A knockdown and RPS15AP12 knockout. (B) Overlapped DEGs of RNA‐seq upon RPS15A knockdown and RPS15AP12 knockout. (C) Enrichment network showing innate immune‐related pathways and corresponding hub genes by RPS15A knockdown and RPS15AP12 knockout. (D) Heatmap of 25 shared DEGs in innate immune‐related and proliferation‐related pathways in RNA‐seq upon RPS15A knockdown and RPS15AP12 knockout. (E) RT‐qPCR detecting RNA level of 25 shared DEGs in innate immune‐related and apoptosis‐related pathways in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines upon RPS15AP12 KO. (F) RT‐qPCR detecting RNA level of 25 shared DEGs in innate immune‐related pathways in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines upon RPS15A knockdown. (G) Western blot assays detecting protein expression using antibodies as indicated in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines upon RPS15A knockdown. (H) Western blot assays detecting protein expression using antibodies as indicated in OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cell lines upon RPS15AP12 depletion. One‐way ANOVA, * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001; NS, not significant.

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies were as follows: METTL3 (1:1000, 15073‐1‐AP, Proteintech), FTO (1:1000, 27226‐1‐AP, Proteintech), YTHDF2 (1:2000, 24744‐1‐AP, Proteintech), RPS15A (1:1000, TA369533S, ORIGENE), MDA5 (1:2000, 21775‐1‐AP, Proteintech), RIG‐1 (1:1000, 20566‐1‐AP, Proteintech), TBK1 (1:1000, #3504, CST), p‐TBK1 (1:1000, 82383‐1‐RR, Proteintech), IRF3 (1:5000, 11312‐1‐AP, Proteintech), p‐IRF3 (1:1000, 29528‐1‐AP, Proteintech), GAPDH (1:10000, 60004‐1‐Ig, Proteintech).

    Techniques: RNA Sequencing, Knockdown, Knock-Out, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Expressing